![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
>> On 24 Nov 2005 06:34:48, Stephen Adler <adler at stephenadler.com> said: > I also have the option of using gcc 4.0 instead. Does anyone have > any advice of the advantages of gcc 4 over gcc 3.4? Optimisations are a good reason to consider gcc 4; the biggest difference between the two is the merge of the tree-ssa branch to gcc 4, which allows many whole-program optimisations that weren't possible using the previous (RTL) optimisers, since tree-ssa retains a higher-level view of the code than RTL did. > Some people will never adopt a X.0 version of a package since they > deam it unstable Several Linux distributions are shipping with gcc 4 only and with the system compiled using gcc 4, so there's no lack of trust in it from the community. - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb at mrao.cam.ac.uk> <http://www.mrao.cam.ac.uk/~cjb/>
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |