Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:24 -0500, Matej Cepl <ceplm at seznam.cz> wrote: > Krusader -- there is nothing better in twin-pane file managers on Linux. > Period. I'll surely take your word for it! I Googled, went to the Web site (Sourceforge?), decided to look at all 23 screen shots at once, and downloaded. Not installed, yet, but it won't be long. Indeed; I see why you say what you say. Up to now, the best I knew of, emelFM, seems to be a one-man creation, and imho he's done a nice job. However, Krusader seems to be a collaborative program. > Yes, it is KDE (but that's your problem that you use Gnome :-D). <chat> Well, I'm not partisan about the two choices. For now, I'm running Libranet 3.0 on a trailing-edge machine (Deskpro 4K, 233 MHz P II, 128MB/40GB.) Gnome apps seem to run faster, but KDE seems perhaps to be better integrated, and generally looks nicer. KDE also seems to eat CPU cycles; the bouncing squashing icon on starting an app. isn't much fun past, say, 15 seconds or so. While KDE's graphic designers were clueless about the graceful shape of a real gear tooth, the GNOME footprint struck me as ugly. In all, I think of it as a healthy competition. </kitty> > Matej Btw, in Czech, do you spell your last name as )B?epl? (For those not Unicode-enabled, [)B?] is a Latin capital letter C with caron, U+010C) Best regards, and thank you, indeed! -- NB Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ In Linux, looks do count.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |