Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:33:45PM -0500, Nicholas Bodley wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:03:24 -0500, Matej Cepl <ceplm at seznam.cz> wrote: > > <chat> > Well, I'm not partisan about the two choices. For now, I'm running > Libranet 3.0 on a trailing-edge machine (Deskpro 4K, 233 MHz P II, > 128MB/40GB.) Gnome apps seem to run faster, but KDE seems perhaps to be > better integrated, and generally looks nicer. KDE also seems to eat CPU > cycles; the bouncing squashing icon on starting an app. isn't much fun > past, say, 15 seconds or so. While KDE's graphic designers were clueless > about the graceful shape of a real gear tooth, the GNOME footprint struck > me as ugly. In all, I think of it as a healthy competition. > </kitty> Looks like no one has yet mentioned Rox-Filer, which is technically a one-pane file manager, but can become a two-pane by simply opening up another window. It's small, fast, and generally Does The Right Thing. On a slow machine with limited RAM, I'd highly recommend it. -dsr- -- What's the best thing you could be doing right now? Why aren't you?
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |