Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 07:10:53PM -0500, Matthew Nicholson wrote: > Ward Vandewege wrote: > >On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 06:02:54PM -0500, James Kramer wrote: > >> Also, It has the option a selecting either an ATI Radeon XPRESS 200M or > >> NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400. I was thinking about selecting the ATI. > > Be very careful with ATI - their linux support is essentially > > non-existant. I think you'll find NVIDIA driver support far > > superior. ATI sucks, frankly. > I second this. i've had little to no issues with nvidia. I like this, because you're both openly extolling the virtues of horribly proprietary video drivers as if there's no problem :-) > any ATI's i've delt with have given some sort of problem. I had only ever bought ATI cards until recently (specifically avoiding nvidia because of their proprietary binary only drivers for Linux). In fact back in the 90s I called up ATI's CEO's office (transatlantic calls used to actually cost something here) to thank them for helping out the GATOS guys with their All In Wonder support. Those were the days of co-operation. In today's world, ATI have to look after the bottom line and that means X-Box, which in turn means that various docs seem to be less forthcoming lately. But those are the breaks of big business. Nvidia aren't any better. As a result, it's difficult now to know who to go with. I do know that the Ubuntu guys (and others) are more likely to recommend Intel graphics (so was claimed at the FOSDEM last week) because support is apparently more forthcoming than elsewhere. I admit that I do now own exactly one device with an Nvidia graphics chipset, but I'm running the open source driver, which can at least be supported on some level by the community. My point is, next time you get one of these cards or a laptop with a graphics chipset in it for which you think there is super supoort, check that it's not in the form of a closed source binary only driver and that the vendor is actually working to get support into upstream Linux. If you still don't think I have a point, try telling the Linux kernel community about any problems you have with a closed source binary only driver and see how far that gets you. It's impossible for the community to help you when you use one of these things. :-) Jon.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |