![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
James R. Van Zandt wrote: > Bill Ricker wrote: > >>>would prefer longer battery life in exchange for high speed graphics. >> >>Well, Battery Life and Cutting Edge are definitely a tradeoff. > > > Speaking of battery life: I have a Dell X300 on which I can slow the > clock speed by a factor of 2. I would really like to be able to slow > it by a factor of 10, or even 100. A text editor in a virtual console > should still be able to keep up with my typing. Do any current > machines allow for really low clock speeds? Or for running with the > display light off? > > - Jim Van Zandt > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > My observations, perusing the laptop boards is that reduced cpu speed support is dependant on the manufacturers bios. My thinkpad supports full and 2/3s. It would be nice if it was possible to dial in the speed you could tolerate. Jim
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |