Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ed Hill wrote: >On Fri, 2006-03-17 at 08:55 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: > > >>Most commercial Unix systems were internationalized a number of years ago. I >>know that back in 1994/1995 time frame, when I was maintaining lint(1) on >>Tru64 Unix (actually OSF/1 at that time), I made a number of changes to the >>messages. We used a message catalog, and when we made changes the messages >>had to be translated to a number of languages. We had an I18N group to do >>that. >> >>The problem with Unix/Linux is that it is still based on 8-bit characters, >>and an internationalized program must be set up to use either 16-bit or >>wider. Java was written where it's native character type is 16-bits which >>is sufficient for a majority of languages, but not for Asian languages. >> >> > > >The above, as written, is simply not true. UTF-8 is a perfectly valid >Unicode encoding and, for the characters that match the ASCII 0x00 to >0x7F, it uses the *identical* 8bits/character encoding and is therefore >largely (read: as much as possible) backwards-compatible with older >programs, text files, etc. > >UTF-8 has been the default encoding on many popular Linux distros for >some years now and *many* popular programs (including most in the Gnome >and KDE suite) support it. For instance, Red Hat 8 (released Sept 2002) >was one of the first distros to use (by default!) the UTF-8 encoding > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html > >So quit spreading nonsense, Jerry. If you don't have a clue about the >topic (which is clearly the case here), then keep your wildly untrue FUD >to yourself. > >Ed > >ps - If I'd hired you to work on i18n project and you displayed such > a shocking level of ignorance, I'd have terminated you on the > spot. > > > Ed, Ad hominem attacks say more about the person posting them then about the accused, and I didn't see anything to disagree with in Jerry's posting, let alone anything that would justify an accussation of lying. I suggest you apologize: flame wars about VI vs. emacs may be fun, but this is just degrading, to both you and the BLU. Bill Horne -- E. William Horne William Warren Consulting Computer and Network Installation and Service 781 784-7287 (Voice) 781 784-0951 (Fax) 339 440-0724 (Cell)
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |