Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
well, i;ve been following this thread, and it seems its big and it just hit digg: http://digg.com/software/MAJOR_PROBLEMS_It_s_not_Firefox_it_s_Comcastic On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 15:49 -0400, Matt Shields wrote: > You're right, level 1 tech is for weeding out the people who claim to > know what they're talking about, and 99.99999% of the time most people > fall into this situation. And when my problem has been a "my service is > down" I've opened a ticket and left it at that till it's fixed. And I > have been in their situation (a long time ago), but I'm not trying to be > their friend, I'm trying to get a problem fixed. > > For the rare cases where it has been a system wide problem, I have > forced my way to the right people to get the problem fixed faster. > There's no sense explaining routing or other type of problems to a level > 1 tech that's going to try to walk me through some flowchart script > which doesn't apply to the problem I've called about. Then having them > open a ticket and wait for 100's or 1000's of other complaints to come > in for the network or system engineers to finally look into the problem. > > Think of it this way, if there is a system wide problem I can do two > things. Either sit around and do nothing because it's not my company so > why should I help them. Or offer to help. And when I have I've been > thanked for me taking my time. > > Back in the day when I was at a local ISP (when most of the ISPs were > local), we knew every other network and system admin in our area and > called them when we knew of internet wide or Tier1 ISP wide problems and > they called us. Even though we were competitors. Everyone helped each > other out. > > Matthew Shields > Sr Systems Administrator > NameMedia, Inc. > (P) 781-839-2828 > mshields at namemedia.com > http://www.namemedia.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Valites [mailto:matthew.valites at webex.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 3:26 PM > To: Matt Shields > Cc: markw at mohawksoft.com; Jeff Kinz; discuss at blu.org > Subject: Re: Comcast, Firefox, google, youtube > > > > Maybe it's just my attitude, but I won't put up with they're attitudes > > or their policies of dealing with Tech Level 1. In cases like this > > where they are having a network wide problem and I'm trying to help > them > > I've always been escalated to the network team. I also don't waste my > > time trying to explain to them what I've found out, I make it very > clear > > that they are wasting everyone's time by not putting me in touch with > > who they need to. > > > Have you thought about from the tech's level? Think of how many people > claim to know what they're talking about and ask to get escalated to the > > next level of support. Most of the first tier support procedures are so > > simple that if you actually follow them, it won't take more than 5 > minutes. > > I've had support escalate problems to me because the client claimed they > > knew what they were talking about when in fact they didn't, and our > first or second line of support could have solved their problem easily. > > This actually just happened earlier this week. > > Tech Level 1 isn't meant to do anything more than filter out 95% of the > problems that people encounter. > > ~Matt > -- Matthew Nicholson <sjoeboo at sjoeboo.com> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060926/355b87ef/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |