BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP

Subject: Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP
From: blu at scrunch.net (Bob - BLU)
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:20:44 -0400
In-reply-to: <20061004203809.10131f29@gaf.gaf.net>
References: <20061004203809.10131f29@gaf.gaf.net>

On 10/04/06 20:38, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> I've just inherited the job of configuring 4 servers in a small office.
> Right now 2 of the servers are running RHEL 4 ...
> 
> I was starting to set up NIS, but I was thinking of maybe LDAP

It seems that NIS is the past and LDAP is the future.
Plus, LDAP can be secured with TLS.

system-config-authentication

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Follow-Ups:
- Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

References:
- Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

Prev by Date: Guru Net
Next by Date: Web-based calendar software?
Previous by thread: Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP
Next by thread: Samba vs. NIS vs. LDAP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org