Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 20:20:44 -0400 Bob - BLU <blu at scrunch.net> wrote: > On 10/04/06 20:38, Jerry Feldman wrote: > > I've just inherited the job of configuring 4 servers in a small office. > > Right now 2 of the servers are running RHEL 4 ... > > > > I was starting to set up NIS, but I was thinking of maybe LDAP > > It seems that NIS is the past and LDAP is the future. > Plus, LDAP can be secured with TLS. > > system-config-authentication I agree that LDAP is the future. I did find out that corporate runs NIS even though they have a mixed bag of Solaris, Linux, and Windows. I think my boss wants to keep our systems isolated from corporate, so I will be making a decision on Monday. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20061008/bacc9318/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |