Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
While I'm not expert in these matters, it's my understanding that relevant legal issues are outlined by the FCC in its Triennial Review Order, 18 FCC Rcd 17371-78, paragraphs 630-41. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-36A1.pdf It seems that Verizon is obliged to make "routine network modifications" such as may be needed in your circumstances, but as per paragraphs 640-641 there was discretion left to state public utility commissions as to whether Verizon could charge Covad for such modifications. The costs may already be folded into what the CLEC is paying for the loop, and if that's the case, there can't be any double recovery through an additional non-recurring charge. - Stephen Ronan -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |