Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Follow-up: I'm a Verizon customer. I do not think they would feel compelled to fix a non-direct customer's line (just does not make sense to me). The ISP (Speakeasy?) should deal with Verizon, since that must be the direct relation - just a guess really. Cheers Al Wheeler wrote: > Verizon had a "bad" server (DSL) in my area that was driving me up a > wall. It took me a month of phone calling, but they finally fixed it. > They do not believe in making it easy. They assume everyone is an > illiterate, it seems, until proven otherwise. They have a great amount > of difficulty ever admitting they could possibly make a mistake or > have a problem. > > Whoever implemented their web pages and automated phone system really > ripped off the the shareholders and the consumers at the same time. An > almost admirable accomplishment, if it were not so darned despicable! > > Anyway, > get the attention of a supervisor as quickly as possible, by > exhausting the poor phone support tech of all other possible excuses. > Actually, they are very nice and polite once you get to talk to a > human.... ( You can say whatever you want to the machine... ;-) ) > > I ended up replacing my router and dsl modem, and got hooked into a > one year commitment, before they would address the problem with any > seriousness. I guess it is clear that if I had been more of a > cheapskate, etc., etc., I could have gotten it fixed for free. > > The one year commitment changed my monthly cost from $46+ to ~$30. I > have had dsl since 2001 or 2002, maybe. It is quite a shell game they > have going. It pretty much appears that few if any in the Verizon camp > knows the score. Why should a long term monthly customer pay more than > somebody "commiting" to a one year "contract." You basically know what > I would rail about regarding consumers rights, so I won't. > > Good luck > > Richard Chonak wrote: > >> Is there any way to get Verizon to fix DSL line problems when it is >> not the ISP? >> >> I've been a satisfied subscriber to DSL service from Speakeasy for a >> few years. However, the line quality has declined to the point where >> I can't get stable service any faster than 384/384 kbps. (I'm paying >> for 1.5M/384.) >> >> My apartment is 15,000 feet from the CO in Wakefield, which tests out >> as 17,000 (somehow, "because the DSL modem adds 2000 feet"). >> >> Provisioned rate Margins, dB (down/up) Stability >> 608/384 8/10 intermittent >> 384/384 11/11 steady >> >> In a recent effort to improve things, I ordered DSL service on a >> separate line; Verizon provided it, but the margins on that line >> weren't any better: >> >> Provisioned rate Margins, dB (down/up) Stability >> 1.5M/384 5/10 none >> >> Covad declared the line unfeasible, so the new service was cancelled. >> From what Speakeasy tells me, Covad has no leverage to get Verizon to >> meet any quality standards. >> >> Do I have any options to make some improvement here? >> >> (I'm staying a Speakeasy customer, at least for now, because their >> T&C allows home servers.) >> >> Really, what I'd like is a way to get Verizon to acknowledge a >> problem and correct it. >> >> Thanks for any info, suggestions, etc. >> >> --RC >> >> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |