Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Indeed, 4 servers and 3-6 users, easy enough to maintain users/groups direct on each server. Is there a middle ground between this and using LDAP that you might recommend? Just curious... On 10/09/06 16:52, Christoph Doerbeck wrote: > IMHO... The quantity of boxes you describe, both NIS and/or LDAP seem > overkill. > > On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:38 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: >> I've just inherited the job of configuring 4 servers in a small office. >> Right now 2 of the servers are running RHEL 4 (IA64 systems) with >> essentially no users. There will probably be 3 of us that will be using >> the servers, but the other 3 in the office may at some point. The other >> 2 servers are Intel whitebox quad core Xeons that just arrived from >> Intel yesterday. >> >> I was starting to set up NIS, but I was thinking of maybe LDAP would be >> a better choice. I don't expect us to have more servers than that. >> They are really development machines. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |