BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.

Subject: Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
From: me at mattgillen.net (Matthew Gillen)
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:09:11 -0500
In-reply-to: <4576A599.4050608@mail2.gis.net>
References: <45740629.5070600@mail2.gis.net> <200612040701.02492.fred@planetaryserver.com> <4576A599.4050608@mail2.gis.net>

jbk wrote:
> I'm not to the point of inserting the module yet. I first want to know
> what the procedure is to compile the module. What do I need to do to
> compile the module for the stock kernel that fedora ships. 

see section 8.7 of the release notes, available online here:
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc6/en_US/

Matt

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Follow-Ups:
- Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
  - From: jbk at mail2.gis.net (jbk)

References:
- Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
  - From: jbk at mail2.gis.net (jbk)
- Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
  - From: fred at planetaryserver.com (Fred)
- Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
  - From: jbk at mail2.gis.net (jbk)

Prev by Date: leading underscores..
Next by Date: Help Desk programs?
Previous by thread: Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
Next by thread: Compiling a custom kernel vs. compiling a single module.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org