Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 15:21:30 -0500 From: "Martin Owens" <doctormo at gmail.com> First thing is that the FSF tends to take business to court on behalf of the software programmers. so even if Novell broke the GPLv2 on the Linux Kernel; the FSF would still go after them on behalf of the Linux Kernel devs. obviously asking first might be an idea but breaking the license is breaking the license regardless of who hauls them into court over it. Only a copyright holder can take someone to court for violation of a copyright license. The FSF doesn't hold copyright to any of the Linux kernel that I'm aware of, and so would have no standing to go to court. It would have to be one of more of the kernel developers suing over a violation of the kernel's copyright. The FSF could take action if the copyright to any of the GNU tools were violated (since the FSF holds the copyright to the entire GNU toolchain). I read something else recently (don't remember just where) where Eben Moglen said that his words were taken completely out of context. The new GPLv3 will be implemented by enough tools, especially since this deal. Imagen Novell unable to distribute new version of Samba Server/Client which integrate better with Vista. they'd have to spend a lot of money on this Microsoft partnership to build up current v2 versions and the pace of FOSS has always been in the community not in the single business. Besides it's not about forcing any body to do anything, it's about the agreement that is agreed upon by Company A in order to get and redistribute software that it wishes to make money from if it suddenly disagrees half way through then they no longer have the right to distribute the software. >From what I've read the real motivation is to ensure that nobody can pull this kind of stunt, and to force Novell to change or abrogate the patent agreement. -- Robert Krawitz <rlk at alum.mit.edu> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf at uunet.uu.net Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |