![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
markw at mohawksoft.com wrote: > The drives I am testing are Western Digital WD2500JS and WD2500JB, > which are identical except for the interface, and the SATA drives are > more than 10% faster, and since the same computer was used and exact > same drive mechanics are involved, and writing directly to the > device, one has to assume that the different transfer characteristics > lead to that. There are other variables to consider. The SATA drive is no doubt attached via a different host controller chip, which might have a more efficient internal design that has nothing to do with the fact that it is SATA. In addition, that host controller might be attached to the CPU differently - passing through more or fewer PCI bridges. And lastly, the device driver, which I believe is different between PATA and SATA under Linux, might introduce differences in performance. At least the good news is that the new style interfaces isn't 10% slower. :-) -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |