Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 2/7/07, Tom Metro <blu at vl.com> wrote: > At least the good news is that the new style interfaces isn't 10% > slower. :-) His test has not proved or disproved that! It could be the case that the PATA interface is actually faster, but the component connections on the motherboard for PATA access are slowing it down by more than 10%. And who knows, the SATA driver (sata_mv?) might be really efficient and be pumping up the results of the test to make it appear that SATA is faster. And to take it one step further, how do we know that the drive isn't defective in some way mechanically. I know for a fact that EMC rejects 90% of the drives that Seagate provides them for data storage because they don't meet specs. Effectively, the consumers get the reject drives while EMC provides some QA for Seagate :-) -- Kristian Hermansen -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |