Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Grant M. wrote: > So you can be the Linux elitist, and say that 'newbies need not apply', > or you can step up to the plate and offer a solution. I just think that > anyone who wants to beat Microsoft at their own game has to offer more > for less. What is this game of which you speak? Making money? World domination? Quite frankly, I don't give a rats butt what everyone else uses, and so the "world domination" angle doesn't do it for me. I use Linux for everything I can because I like it and I think it gives me a productivity edge. Do I think that there are a whole lot of windows users that would be better off in various ways if they "saw the light" and started using linux et al? Of course. Am I going to devote all my free time to single-handedly converting all those people and providing "free support" for them? No way. What would I get out of it? The satisfaction of seeing Microsoft's empire fall? (will happen eventually without my help) Better software for myself? (I doubt it: if they were technically proficient enough to fix bugs and solve problems on their own, they wouldn't have needed support in the first place) The only benefit I would get from linux-as-a-whole having higher market share would be hardware vendors being pressured to produce linux drivers on their own. But the return-on-investment there looks pretty crappy, considering that most hardware worth buying is already supported by linux in some way (either through volunteer efforts or a handful of clueful vendors). Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |