Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I'm doing some experimenting with Mini-ITX with a view to eventually provide an upgrade path for our remote monitoring and control system which runs on the AXIS LX chip (cris architecture, 100 mips, 16mb flash). I'm looking here for some suggestions and guidance along this line, particularly as to creating a linux build for the platform. Board: VIA EPIA ML6000EAG (600MHz C3 processor;VIA CLE266 north bridge; VIA VT8235 south bridge) Memory: 256mb Disk: 512MB "industrial" compact flash I've done quite a bit of looking and it seems that all the distributions that have been packaged for these boards provide a gui. One of these is worth mention here: Damn Small Linux. This is a remarkable achievement considering the disk/memory footprint and is certainly something I'd consider if we ever provided a fancy display. However I don't need or want a gui now. The system requirements include support for a text LCD display (via USB), a sensor network (also USB), data storage (I use sqlite currently), and a simple web server for configuration on site (I use Klone). All of these requirements are met on the AXIS chip. The new system will provide considerably more horsepower and, importantly, "disk" space, and therefore lends itself to running php, perl, apache, and MySql. Php and MySql would be the primary services used by the measurement/control system. The box will, of course, need to communicate out (to our server for data transfer) so an ethernet port will need to be supported. We will see a speed increase in development time for the unit and a commensurate gain in ability - at least, this is my goal. It may be that sticking with Klone and Sqlite and abandoning php (instead using perl) is a better set of options, and I am not dismissing this idea. My questions are: - is 512 mb of flash sufficient? - I am rather comfortable with Fedora Core, and particularly managing updates through yum. Should I give up FC(6?) due to size requirements? - On the above, FC6 will not install to a device with less than 650MB or so (at least in my testing so far this is as low as I could go). Is there another way to squeeze the distribution down? (I'm experimenting by installing to a hard disk, removing everything not needed, and creating a kickstart from there, but perhaps there's a better method?) Sorry this is long. I'll include any needed detail in future responses. ps: although the board is "fanless" i am at a loss to understand how the north/southbridge chips can possibly survive even a minimal load (although they continue on!). I guess these are designed to run hot, but even in open airflow the heat sinks on each of these seem to reach about 60 degrees C on the top surface - hot enough that finger pressure longer than 10 seconds or so invites a burn sensation. The CPU runs much cooler. VIA says little about temperatures on these boards. Perhaps there's some practical experience here I can draw on? /mark -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |