Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Debian/Ubuntu summary

I'd like to thank everyone who offered their valuable insights.

The consensus is most people use Debian for server use and Ubuntu for 

I happened to have a copy of Ubuntu 6.10 on CD and installed it flawlessly 
on my home system alongside Win XP Home.   After apt-get update and 
apt-get upgrade, I found I had a conflict, which synaptic helped to easily 
resolve.    I then selected a software menu item which gave me to option 
to perform a full upgrade, which I selected.  Haven't been home since to 
check on that.

But, with the initial install done, my FAT and NTFS partitions were 
readily mounted and viewable.   I also had easy mounts of a CF card and 
Sony memory stick.

Very nice.

I do recommend Ubuntu.   I've gone through Fedora 5 and 6, along with 
CentOS 4.4 and 5.   With each of those, I've had conflicts of one kind or 
another which were incredibly painful to try and resolve.   Synaptic deal 
magical wonders.

Kudos to the Ubuntu team.

We'll see how the 7.04 upgrade turns out tonight...

Again, thanks to all.


This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!

Boston Linux & Unix /