Latest on SCO vs. Novell

[nmeyers at javalinux.net (Nathan Meyers)]

Matthew Gillen wrote:
> Matt Shields wrote:
>> IANAL, but I believe it's part of the contract that attorney's sign.
>> I bet they've been paid plenty up until now. 
> 
> Exactly.  My conspiracy theory of the day:
> Where do think that $10 million that M$ paid SCO for "licensing" went?  I
> wouldn't be surprised if it was (an unwritten) part of the deal that part (or
> most) of that money went toward financing the lawsuits.

I don't incline toward conspiracy theories, but that's not a bad one. It
doesn't matter if SCO wins - every day in court is a another day of FUD,
which is good for marketing. An effective attorney can keep this going
for years.

Nathan

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.