Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Matthew Gillen wrote: > Matt Shields wrote: >> IANAL, but I believe it's part of the contract that attorney's sign. >> I bet they've been paid plenty up until now. > > Exactly. My conspiracy theory of the day: > Where do think that $10 million that M$ paid SCO for "licensing" went? I > wouldn't be surprised if it was (an unwritten) part of the deal that part (or > most) of that money went toward financing the lawsuits. I don't incline toward conspiracy theories, but that's not a bad one. It doesn't matter if SCO wins - every day in court is a another day of FUD, which is good for marketing. An effective attorney can keep this going for years. Nathan -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |