BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Latest on SCO vs. Novell

Subject: Latest on SCO vs. Novell
From: sethg at ropine.com (Seth Gordon)
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 13:13:04 -0400
In-reply-to: <20070426130915.58127ea7@gaf.blu.org>
References: <20070425130236.1544985e@gaf.blu.org> <462F943C.1070104@ropine.com> <20070426073927.4d9e491e@gaf.blu.org> <100716920704260500v33a920a0r53afcb7313f0168f@mail.gmail.com> <4630AD6A.5090501@ropine.com> <20070426130915.58127ea7@gaf.blu.org>

Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Just to buoy up the conspiracy theory.
> SCO's attorneys are Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. One might remember
> that they represented Microsoft in the anti-trust suit.

Boies was the *Justice Department's* hired gun in the Microsoft suit,
not Microsoft's.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Follow-Ups:
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: jboland at citistreetonline.com (Boland, John)

References:
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: sethg at ropine.com (Seth Gordon)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: mattboston at gmail.com (Matt Shields)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: sethg at ropine.com (Seth Gordon)
- Latest on SCO vs. Novell
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

Prev by Date: Latest on SCO vs. Novell
Next by Date: Latest on SCO vs. Novell
Previous by thread: Latest on SCO vs. Novell
Next by thread: Latest on SCO vs. Novell
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org