fedora 7

[me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org (Matthew Gillen)]

Kristian Hermansen wrote:
> On 6/4/07, Matthew Gillen <me-5yx05kfkO/aqeI1yJSURBw at public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> They took out some of the SELinux policy modules that allowed you to 
>> exempt an entire daemon. I see how those were a hack to begin with, but
>> now I have to figure out how to make SELinux play nice(r) with my
>> screwy setup...
> 
> Has anyone played with AppArmor rather than SELinux?

No.  I read up on it at one point, I think once suse decided they were going
to ship it, and came to the personal conclusion that SELinux was the better
approach in general.  It was quite some time ago, so I can't recall exactly
how AppArmor works (and consequently, my reasons for not liking it).

Plus I like that the NSA is active on the SELinux mailing list :-)


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.