Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Monday 04 June 2007 13:13:16 Tom Metro wrote: > markw-FJ05HQ0HCKaWd6l5hS35sQ at public.gmane.org wrote: > > I don't want to run a database server just for an application. > ... > > If the application is going to embed its database, then let > > it do what it wants. > > I've read that MythTV is moving towards an embedded MySQL. As an option, perhaps. But not wholesale. At least not based on any discussions I've seen. > > If I have to run a database server, I want to be able to chose my > > database. > > This is an "old school" view of databases. I've ran into this before > when selling a product using MySQL into large organizations. If Oracle > is their in-house database, then they want everything to run on Oracle, > even if that means performance will suffer. > > It's easy to treat MySQL as an embedded database, even without using the > embedded version which I believe has only recently become available. It > requires few resources, minimal maintenance, and can be configured to > talk to its clients over a UNIX socket, so there are no network security > risks and no conflicts with other processes. +1 I view MythTV as a dedicated appliance. So what if it needs MySQL?!? -- Jarod Wilson jarod-ajLrJawYSntWk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |