Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
We've talked about Gmail's spam filtering on this list before, so in that light I'll mention that I just discovered I'm experiencing a fairly high false positive rate. Several months back I switched over a bunch of mailing list subscriptions to my Gmail account on the theory that I could make use of Gmail's search tools to search through the archives (though I've yet to make use of that). This seemed to work fine, and I haven't used the web UI in months, instead downloading the messages via POP3 to Thunderbird. Today a rare spam made it through to my inbox, so I logged in to the web UI to tag it as spam, and while there decided to check the spam folder. I was troubled by finding 3 or 4 messages incorrectly marked as spam just on the first screen of 50 messages. After reviewing all 333 messages, 27 were incorrectly categorized as spam, or 8%. That's not so hot. (The 8% is a bit misleading though, as a false positive rate would normally be stated as a percentage of the overall mail volume. Theoretically the search "in:anywhere after:2007/6/18 before:2007/8/19" should return a count covering the same range as the spam folder, but Gmail reports only 80 matches, yet perpetually boosts that number as you page through the results. Using my downloaded message archives, I'd estimate the number of messages to be around 5000 for that time period, so the false positive rate is more like 0.5%.) I tagged them all as not spam, but as I understand it, that will only whitelist the specific senders, and not necessarily solve the long term problem. It seems Gmail has become a bit too aggressive in their spam filtering. Hopefully someday they'll add support for IMAP, which will make it much easier to keep tabs on the spam folder. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |