Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 7/18/07, Tom Metro <blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org> wrote: > We've talked about Gmail's spam filtering on this list before, so in > that light I'll mention that I just discovered I'm experiencing a fairly > high false positive rate. I've found a very low false-positive rate at Google and low leakage (false negative) as well, in comparison to Yahoo or Spam-Assassin + SomethingElse at TheWorld. (All comparisons based on using my well-advertised n1vux-WYrOkVUspZo at public.gmane.org forwarder massive spam feed plus whatever else I get for being on lists and things.) (Yahoo doesn't get more false positives, but gets more false negatives.) But I clear the buckets every day or two ... and it learns from what I say is NOT SPAM. You have have cascaded errors because you didn't NOT SPAM the first of kind. Adding the list to your address book helps on Yahoo spam, may on Google. Only thing I've possibly seen better is commercial Postini service, which we use at work - only a couple false positives/negatives for 50-100 postives per month. -- Bill n1vux-WYrOkVUspZo at public.gmane.org bill.n1vux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |