Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
With several score messages a day, for over a year, I have had no known false positives with Google Mail. On 7/18/07, Tom Metro <blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org> wrote: > > We've talked about Gmail's spam filtering on this list before, so in > that light I'll mention that I just discovered I'm experiencing a fairly > high false positive rate. > > Several months back I switched over a bunch of mailing list > subscriptions to my Gmail account on the theory that I could make use of > Gmail's search tools to search through the archives (though I've yet to > make use of that). This seemed to work fine, and I haven't used the web > UI in months, instead downloading the messages via POP3 to Thunderbird. > > Today a rare spam made it through to my inbox, so I logged in to the web > UI to tag it as spam, and while there decided to check the spam folder. > I was troubled by finding 3 or 4 messages incorrectly marked as spam > just on the first screen of 50 messages. After reviewing all 333 > messages, 27 were incorrectly categorized as spam, or 8%. That's not so > hot. > > (The 8% is a bit misleading though, as a false positive rate would > normally be stated as a percentage of the overall mail volume. > Theoretically the search "in:anywhere after:2007/6/18 before:2007/8/19" > should return a count covering the same range as the spam folder, but > Gmail reports only 80 matches, yet perpetually boosts that number as you > page through the results. Using my downloaded message archives, I'd > estimate the number of messages to be around 5000 for that time period, > so the false positive rate is more like 0.5%.) > > I tagged them all as not spam, but as I understand it, that will only > whitelist the specific senders, and not necessarily solve the long term > problem. It seems Gmail has become a bit too aggressive in their spam > filtering. > > Hopefully someday they'll add support for IMAP, which will make it much > easier to keep tabs on the spam folder. > > -Tom > > -- > Tom Metro > Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA > "Enterprise solutions through open source." > Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |