Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Scott Ehrlich wrote: > I'm pricing out some servers (from Dell) and deciding between their 1955 > blade server and a 2950 2U server. I learned the 1955 has only 4 RAM > slots, whereas the 2950 has 8. Thus, I could populate with 4 x 4 GB > modules, or 2 x 2 GB modules (cost savings). But, for compute-intensive > work, where the majority of a program will work between CPU and RAM, how > much of a cost, compute-wise, is there, between 4 GB and 2 x 2 GB? > > I could go with 10 blades, or 10 2950 machines. The benefit of the > 2950 would be more slots for RAM and, with its architecture, easier to > manage and expand (I work with two of the 2950 machines anyway, and have > seen the 1955). > > I'm not a/the programmer. I'm just relaying, and using my resources to > get the best hardware that fits the need. > > Thanks for insight/feedback. > > Scott
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |