Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Henry Hall wrote: > Scott Ehrlich wrote: >> I'm pricing out some servers (from Dell) and deciding between their 1955 >> blade server and a 2950 2U server. I learned the 1955 has only 4 RAM >> slots, whereas the 2950 has 8. Thus, I could populate with 4 x 4 GB >> modules, or 2 x 2 GB modules (cost savings). But, for compute-intensive >> work, where the majority of a program will work between CPU and RAM, how >> much of a cost, compute-wise, is there, between 4 GB and 2 x 2 GB? >> >> I could go with 10 blades, or 10 2950 machines. The benefit of the >> 2950 would be more slots for RAM and, with its architecture, easier to >> manage and expand (I work with two of the 2950 machines anyway, and have >> seen the 1955). >> >> I'm not a/the programmer. I'm just relaying, and using my resources to >> get the best hardware that fits the need. >> >> Thanks for insight/feedback. >> >> Scott > > Just as a quick note, besides the amount of RAM (and its cost per GB per > stick), it's also good to know how the "memory bank interleave" > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_organisation#Interleaved) is set up > for each of the systems. > > Henry >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |