Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Jan 30, 2008 10:50 AM, Jarod Wilson <[hidden email]> wrote: > No, I've heard of Gobuntu before. But that isn't the distro du jour > coming out of Canonical. How many people actually use it, juxtaposed to > {Ku,U}buntu? Joe Schmoe has never heard of Gobuntu. He typically grabs > either Ubuntu, Fedora, openSUSE, or <insert other distro(s) here>... Users seem to find the latter more useful -- caring nothing for software purity! > Yes. We let users choose what packages they want at installation time. > All the binary-only firmware bits are in one sub-group ("Hardware > Support"), so if you uncheck that group, you get no binary-only firmware > bits. I don't know if someone has done a Fedora spin that completely > omits those bits or not (would be dead simple to do so), but given that > the Fedora installer actually lets users choose what gets installed, I > don't think its necessary to achieve the same level of purity/freeness > as Gobuntu. Touche! I had no idea! And knowing is half the battle... G - I ... umm wait ... (thx for the info) > Did I mention that I enjoy a good debate too? :D I always see to learn something cool from you when I get fired up. I'll plan to ruffle your feathers in the future too :-) -- Kristian Erik Hermansen "Know something about everything and everything about something." -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |