![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 07:44 -0500, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:43 -0800 > "Kristian Erik Hermansen" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Now, most recent 64-bit distros include 32-bit glibc and other libs > > and run 32-bit executables, so the architecture would not matter. I > > have only tried this with x86-32 -> x86-64, and never had to touch an > > IA64 box, so I am not sure about that :-( Obviously, going from PPC32 > > -> IA64 would definitely not work, but I still wonder if you could > > build a static binary on x86-32 without using the IA64 extensions and > > run it. Hrmm, next time I get my hands on one I will try (I am IA64 > > naive)... > > IA64 is a 64-bit architecture unrelated and incompatible with the x86 > architecture.
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |