Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:33:43 -0800 "Kristian Erik Hermansen" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Now, most recent 64-bit distros include 32-bit glibc and other libs > and run 32-bit executables, so the architecture would not matter. I > have only tried this with x86-32 -> x86-64, and never had to touch an > IA64 box, so I am not sure about that :-( Obviously, going from PPC32 > -> IA64 would definitely not work, but I still wonder if you could > build a static binary on x86-32 without using the IA64 extensions and > run it. Hrmm, next time I get my hands on one I will try (I am IA64 > naive)... IA64 is a 64-bit architecture unrelated and incompatible with the x86 architecture. it has 128 integer and 128 floating point registers as well as a full 64-bit linear addressing capability. But, I do have a couple of x86-64 servers, so I might just try using those. -- -- Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |