Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
2008/3/5, [hidden email] <[hidden email]>: > ... > ... > I'm not saying one is better than the other, but it is clear that some > tasks are ideally suited for one or the other, and performing those tasks > in the wrong environment is harder than it need be. And then there's nano, for people who just want to edit the file and be done, and not waste resources. > Back to editor bashing: I hate emacs as it seems even more arcane and > cumbersome than even vi[m]. I actually don't like vi and would rather vim > for work. I've used eclipse, kdevelop, MS Visual Studio, codeWrite, brief, > m, and a host of others, I always come back to vim. Vim and Nano. Emac's billion keybindings just conflict with every decent window manager out there, besides Ratpoison. Besides, if I were meant to use Emacs, I would have been born with more fingers. I guess if I had pedals to operate M- and C-... 2008/3/5, Derek Martin <[hidden email]>: > regular expressions, etc. Even Firefox lets you type a '/' to start a > search (assuming the focus is not currently on a text input box)... Hell, I can even get Firefox to behave like vim via Vimperator. -- Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin Shardz's Igloo: staticfree.info/~samuel/ Registered GNU/Linux User #410639 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |