Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:02:00 -0400 > "Ben Holland" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Also all the dev's on ext3/4 > > and it's great stability and general all around awesomeness I don't see > > reiser filling a need. > Personally, I would rather see development go into improving ext2/3/4 > as well as cluster file systems. IMHO, reiserFS4 will never go out the > door since Namesys is virtually defunct, and there are a few developers > hanging on. There are clear technical reasons why one would want to consider running ReiserFS/Reiser4 instead of ext3/4. Regardless of the status of Namesys and its associated developers, Reiser is open source, and if the need exists, the project will be continued by other interested developers... -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |