Re: ext4 and reiser4 availability

["David Hummel-2" <user=95@nabble.blu.org>]

 On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> wrote: 
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:02:00 -0400 
>  "Ben Holland" <[hidden email]> wrote: 
>  > Also all the dev's on ext3/4 
>  > and it's great stability and general all around awesomeness I don't see 
>  > reiser filling a need. 
>  Personally, I would rather see development go into improving ext2/3/4 
>  as well as cluster file systems. IMHO, reiserFS4 will never go out the 
>  door since Namesys is virtually defunct, and there are a few developers 
>  hanging on. 

There are clear technical reasons why one would want to consider 
running ReiserFS/Reiser4 instead of ext3/4.  Regardless of the status 
of Namesys and its associated developers, Reiser is open source, and 
if the need exists, the project will be continued by other interested 
developers... 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________ 
Discuss mailing list 
[hidden email] 
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss