Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
ext3/4 is also open sourced.... and has a huge percentage of market share, and has a huge proven track record.... and.... On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 3:31 PM, David Hummel <[hidden email]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:02:00 -0400 > > "Ben Holland" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > Also all the dev's on ext3/4 > > > and it's great stability and general all around awesomeness I don't > see > > > reiser filling a need. > > Personally, I would rather see development go into improving ext2/3/4 > > as well as cluster file systems. IMHO, reiserFS4 will never go out the > > door since Namesys is virtually defunct, and there are a few developers > > hanging on. > > There are clear technical reasons why one would want to consider > running ReiserFS/Reiser4 instead of ext3/4. Regardless of the status > of Namesys and its associated developers, Reiser is open source, and > if the need exists, the project will be continued by other interested > developers... > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |