![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Guys, Any channel bonding experts out there? I have been given a PC with a 4 port gigabit ethernet card which has been channel bonded and I'm thinking the whole setup is wrong. Can a channel bond expert (or anyone who's familiar with the technology) chime in?... My view of channel bonding. ----- ------ |------1000BaseT-------| PC |------1000BaseT-------| PC |------1000BaseT-------| ------- ------- The above configuration, I have two PC's hooked up to each other with three gigabit ethernet cards. Bonding allows me to transfer data at 3Gigabites!? wow! Now, I have the following configure ----- -----------| PC1 | ----- ------ | |------------ ----- PC0 |----------------------| PC2 |------------ ----- ------ | | ----- -----------| PC3 ----- One PC with one multiple 1000BaseT card and 3 PCs with single 1000BaseT cards. Somehow I'm able to ping PC[1-3] from PC0, but I cannot ping PC2 from PC1. (i.e. PC1, PC2 and PC3 cannot talk to each other over ethernet.) Something tells me that the above configuration is just wrong and is not suited for channel bonding. The sysadmin's was trying to turn a 4 channel NIC into a non-blocking switch such that all PC's sit on one subnet and traffic would then be routed through the 4 channel NIC between PC[1-3]. Is my assessment correct? Can one substitute a switch for a multiple NIC card and use channel bonding? Right now the above configuration is not working like a regular switch. Any comments are greatly appreciated. Cheers. Steve. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss