Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 11:31 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:06:51 -0400 > "David Hummel" <[hidden email]> wrote: > > > This isn't really something that a new user should have to worry > > about. Once they get around to understanding more about the apt > > system and related tools, it's not that painful to periodically curate > > the list of installed kernels. > > Just one other thing. I also think that Fedora and OpenSuSE also have > the incorrect strategies in that their updates leave only 1 kernel. My > personal preference is always to have a known good kernel. Before > modularization, I would always keep the generic monolithic kernel that > is known to work. So, at least, IMHO, OpenSuSE and Fedora should retain > at least the previous kernel.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |