Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Jerry Feldman <[hidden email]> wrote: > > Just one other thing. I also think that Fedora and OpenSuSE also have > the incorrect strategies in that their updates leave only 1 kernel. My > personal preference is always to have a known good kernel. Before > modularization, I would always keep the generic monolithic kernel that > is known to work. So, at least, IMHO, OpenSuSE and Fedora should retain > at least the previous kernel. This is incorrect. Fedora retains two kernels: the newest one, and the currently-running one. The currently-running kernel is clearly a known good kernel, as it is in use at the time of the update. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix GnuPG KeyID: 0xD5C7B5D9 / Email: [hidden email] GnuPG FP: 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |