Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Matthew Gillen wrote: > Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: >> When I was in college I purchased box versions of SuSE 7(?) and Red >> Hat 8(?) for a friend (so they had official installation support and >> nice physical documentation books), and then later ripped and uploaded >> them to usenet. > > Does all that mean that you did in fact infringe on their trademark? > Depends if your 'rip' was bit-for-bit faithful recreation. If it wasn't > bit-for-bit then it is obviously trademark infringement. If it was > bit-for-bit, then it (probably) wasn't trademark infringement, but you > may have violated some other part of the license Now that I think about it, I remember that you could download RH8 ISOs for free from a variety of mirrors (or from RH themselves; I remember buying every other version even though they were free to download just because I wanted to support them). So there almost certainly were no restrictions on redistribution of the ISOs. So if you had a bit-for-bit copy, what you did was fine. (although you could have downloaded the ISOs from their ftp server and post them on Usenet just as well) RH9 was the last of the "free download" versions, which led to Fedora being born to satisfy the "I don't need no enterprise support" crowd. RHEL must have some more restrictive licensing (I think it actually has to do with redistributing the /binaries/ that RH produces) that keeps CentOS (or people like them) from just posting the RHEL ISOs. Matt -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |