Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 23:16 -0400, Matthew Gillen wrote: > Kristian Erik Hermansen wrote: > > When I was in college I purchased box versions of SuSE 7(?) and Red > > Hat 8(?) for a friend (so they had official installation support and > > nice physical documentation books), and then later ripped and uploaded > > them to usenet. I am still not sure if that was illegal or not, but > > at the time, I was told that it was not. I have never received an > > official "yes" or "no". That case was quite different than this, > > because those were not third-party modifications. They were directly > > from the originating vendors (SuSE [it was not Novell yet] and Red > > Hat). I presumed what you were paying for were the physical > > distribution, the box, documentation, and included phone support. So, > > was that illegal? > > I don't know about SUSE, but RedHat has always had a policy of making their > improvements open source and pushing them back upstream. So I'd bet money > that you were *not* violating any of the software licenses w.r.t. > redistribution (at least w/ RH8; IIRC there may have been an issue with RH9 > where Redhat purchased an MP3 license, which would have changed the game > completely since that license would be non-transferable, but I digress). At > the same time, software licensing isn't the only issue, there are also > trademark issues.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |