Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Tom Metro wrote: > > There's not really a good excuse for this, as the industry has (or at > least did have) equipment that could provide the channels in the clear > while blocking the ones you don't subscribe to. They were known as > addressable taps. Instead of having a descrambler in a set top box, the > tap out on the pole had electronics to filter out the channels you > weren't supposed to get. (This was a step up from the old passive filter > system, where a change in your subscription required a guy to climb a pole.) Addressable taps don't work with digital cable. In the digital feed there is not a set frequency for a given channel; many channels are multiplexed together. If you blocked a frequency range, it would take out some channels that the subscriber is supposed to get along with the ones that he is not.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |