![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
i've been using the rpm. i've applied the kernel header patch. but, it still fails when building the modules. i have installed 1.x on several i386 machines without a problem, at least after the kernel patch. so, i'm guessing that i'm following the procedure correctly. my explanation/guess/excuse has been that there's something funky with my hardware. also, i have problems installing real vnc on 64 bit. the installs for i386 are a breeze. here's the output from cat /proc/cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 35 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2210.013 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 0 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good nopl pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy bogomips : 4420.02 TLB size : 1024 4K pages clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts fid vid ttp processor : 1 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 15 model : 35 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2210.013 cache size : 1024 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 1 initial apicid : 1 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt lm 3dnowext 3dnow rep_good nopl pni lahf_lm cmp_legacy bogomips : 4419.79 TLB size : 1024 4K pages clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts fid vid ttp tia... On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Ben Eisenbraun <bene-Gk2boCrsRs1AfugRpC6u6w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:06:44AM -0400, John Boland wrote: > > i've been struggling with this x86_64 box for a while. do you have any > > tips/tricks for f9 or is faster/easier to upgrade to f10? > > What are your issues with VMware Server 1.x on x86_64 machines? I have > been running that version, first on Fedora 7 x86_64 and then on CentOS 5 > x86_64 for the last two years without issues. > > The 1.0.2 installation on Fedora 7 (2.6.23) required some patches at the > time to run with that kernel, but I installed 1.0.8 on CentOS 5 (2.6.18) > the other day straight from the download tarball without any issue. > > -ben > > -- > the cure for boredom is curiosity. there is no cure for curiosity. > <dorothy parker> > -- If it ain't broke, you're not trying hard enough!
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |