 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Very true, but i think in context the meaning was clear-- also, we now have 9 out of the top ten ideas! Wow haha. All thanks to you guys along with Reddit. If anyone's interested i also submitted this to Slashdot http://slashdot.org/submission/1150558/YouTube-revamp-imminent-HTML5-dominates-top-ideas On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 17:02, Arc Riley <arcriley-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote: > "Open" video may be confused to include MPEG/4, which has an open spec but > requires patent license. > > It's better to specify Ogg Theora or "Patent-clear". > -- .danny ??? - http://www.google.com/profiles/danny.piccirillo Every (in)decision matters.
 |
|
| BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
| We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. | |
