Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/26/2010 10:56 AM, Jack-rp9/bkPP+cDYtjvyW6yDsg at public.gmane.org wrote: > Sometimes toner levels can be checked remotely or the printers can email > alerts when something is wrong. Set up all the bells > and whistles so it reduces printer management load. It's a good idea to have the printers email their alerts to an "attendant" address which then forwards to whomever has the duty: managers like the flexibility of being able to rotate the chores or juggle assignments during vacations. I like to use google addresses, and I leave a detailed instruction sheet that tells the manager how to change the forwarding: that way, you won't have to keep track of each printer's change procedure, and (as often happens) if the manager in question wants you to do it, it's a matter of a couple of minutes, instead of a big affair that requires a visit to the customer premise. > I think you will still have a few that insist on inkjets on their > desk. You might find a way where IT or 'shared services' pays for the 'shared printers' and > user departments get stuck with a bill for all the 'desk' printers. Managers > like to keep their dept budgets down while using 'others' resources. But make > sure that upper management sees that this is reducing overall cost to > the organization, not just empire building. There are lots of ways to induce people to change, but that's not a task that a technical person needs to get involved with. If the organization's management decides to phase out the inkjets, then they'll be responsible for "selling" the new environment: the most effective tactic I've seen is to simply stop buying supplies for them. Some users will purchase their own, but that peters out after a month or two. > But changes like this all depend on your corporate culture. You're right: a non-profit would be a different challenge than other firms. When you have an environment with lots of "island" resources, the least painful way to retire them is to convince managers to install uniform new computers, and then order machines which don't support the printers in question. I've dealt with firms where the honchos told me "Just do it", and the employees came in the next day to find their inkjet printers gone, and I've worked with some that wouldn't consider /any/ change until a parent organization approved it. It all depends on the organization; I still recommend giving management a clear choice, justified by cost estimates, and then the orders come from above, not from "the evil techie". FWIW. YMMV. See you tomorrow! Bill -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuIC5oACgkQEgIaxumS9uKI2QCePibih/SWPMY08nehciu3gqcU xoYAoNNUXHTErZT92wmTdKWr7DbR5nMy =E3TW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |