BLU Discuss list archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
802.11N confusion
- Subject: 802.11N confusion
- From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:51:21 -0500
- In-reply-to: <20100308120123.GG14999-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA@public.gmane.org>
- References: <4B948B6A.1010706@thekramers.net> <4B94B874.3080705@vl.com> <20100308120123.GG14999@tao.merseine.nu>
Dan Ritter wrote: > The standard wireless tools will tell you: > > dsr at dryad:~$ /sbin/iwlist ath0 scan > ath0 Scan completed : > Cell 01 - Address: 00:18:01:F5:DF:47 > ESSID:"S6534" > Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) > Cell 02 - Address: 00:1D:7E:DF:26:E8 > ESSID:"linksys" > Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) > > Look at the line marked Frequency, followed by Channel. Great tip. The output you show is exactly what I was looking for. However when I try it, it seems to only report information about my current connection. Ah, I see you need to be root to get a full scan. (The output has no warning or error if you aren't root, but this is explained in the man page.) It looks like channel 1, which I'm currently using, is actually the most crowded: % sudo /sbin/iwlist wlan0 scan | fgrep \(Channel Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Frequency:2.437 GHz (Channel 6) Frequency:2.462 GHz (Channel 11) Frequency:2.462 GHz (Channel 11) Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) (On a prior scan there was an additional device on channel 1, and one less device on channel 6.) With 1, 6, and 11 being the 3 channels with no overlap[1], it would seem that channel 11, or a channel between 6 and 11, like 8 or 9, or maybe channel 13, would be my best bet for least interference from other WiFi sources. 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11-2007#Channels_and_international_compatibility I tried channel 9. The noise floor stayed about the same (implying I wasn't seeing interference), but the signal level went from -46 dBm to -85 dBm - or about 95% signal strength (better than usual) to around 40% signal strength. Too low to successfully authenticate. So much for that theory. I gather from the lack of any 5 GHz networks in the scan that my laptop's N card is 2.4 GHz only. Although... % /sbin/iwlist wlan0 freq wlan0 22 channels in total; available frequencies : Channel 01 : 2.412 GHz Channel 02 : 2.417 GHz Channel 03 : 2.422 GHz Channel 04 : 2.427 GHz Channel 05 : 2.432 GHz Channel 06 : 2.437 GHz Channel 07 : 2.442 GHz Channel 08 : 2.447 GHz Channel 09 : 2.452 GHz Channel 10 : 2.457 GHz Channel 11 : 2.462 GHz Channel 12 : 2.467 GHz Channel 13 : 2.472 GHz Channel 36 : 5.18 GHz Channel 40 : 5.2 GHz Channel 44 : 5.22 GHz Channel 48 : 5.24 GHz Channel 149 : 5.745 GHz Channel 153 : 5.765 GHz Channel 157 : 5.785 GHz Channel 161 : 5.805 GHz Channel 165 : 5.825 GHz Current Frequency:2.412 GHz (Channel 1) Not that 5 GHz support does any good with the TRENDnet TEW-652BRP, which as far as I've found, only supports 2.4 GHz. I'm still not sure what to try to encourage an N connection between the laptop and the router. My recollection is that when I put the router into N-only mode, I wasn't able to establish a connection. >> Similarly there was no apparent way to determine what 802.11 standard >> was being employed by your wireless connection in Ubuntu, other than >> inferring it from the reported connection speed. > > You can set this, via 'iwconfig $IFACE modulation $TYPE', but > it's true that most WIC drivers do not make that info available. > > dsr at dryad:~$ /sbin/iwlist ath0 modulation > ath0 unknown modulation information. Likewise: % sudo /sbin/iwlist wlan0 modulation wlan0 unknown modulation information. -Tom -- Tom Metro Venture Logic, Newton, MA, USA "Enterprise solutions through open source." Professional Profile: http://tmetro.venturelogic.com/
- References:
- OT: What we want are things that work; what we get is technology
- From: david-8uUts6sDVDvs2Lz0fTdYFQ at public.gmane.org (David Kramer)
- 802.11N confusion
- From: tmetro-blu-5a1Jt6qxUNc at public.gmane.org (Tom Metro)
- 802.11N confusion
- From: dsr-mzpnVDyJpH4k7aNtvndDlA at public.gmane.org (Dan Ritter)
- OT: What we want are things that work; what we get is technology
- Prev by Date: OT: What we want are things that work; what we get is technology
- Next by Date: OT: What we want are things that work; what we get is technology
- Previous by thread: 802.11N confusion
- Next by thread: 802.11N confusion
- Index(es):