![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Thanks guys. After looking at prices, Rose came down a bit, but not enough for me and my boss. I recommended the Aten CS1716I (http://www.aten-usa.com/?product&cat=3D777&Item=3DCS1716i&PHPSESSID=3De9= f07c4453516feaa58eff1386598ed). After comparing all other units, it appears to be the best unit for us. On 06/27/2010 11:06 AM, Stephen Goulet wrote: > > I had good luck with Raritan except when I put one into a remote > site. The Raritan software would not create the JAVA subprocesses, > i.e. network information not carried to new sub process correctly, > preventing it from getting back thru our fire wall. Rariatan was > working on this but I do not know if they ever resolved it. Without > the firewall issue it worked great. > > > > Jerry Feldman wrote: >> On 06/21/2010 10:56 AM, Chandler, Scott wrote: >> =20 >>> I've been using Avocent model DSR 2020 for about four years now, >>> plus a Dell branded Avocent version before that. They have 16 RJ45 >>> ports which connect over Cat5 to a dongle (they call it a "pod") on >>> each server. =20 >> On 06/21/2010 11:07 AM, Matt Shields wrote: >> =20 >>> I use the Raritan KVM-over-IP and have been extremely happy with >>> them. I use the KX-232 and KX-464 (2 user, 32 port & 4 user, 64 port= ) >>> ones with the Command Center to link them all together. I have quite= >>> a few of them thoughout multiple datacenters and the Command Center >>> provides one UI to get to any server in the network. =20 >> >> Thanks guys. Certainly both Avocent and Raritan will be on my list of >> recommends. I think that Matt mentioned the Raritan back in 2008. I've= >> also got some experience with the Avocent brand stuff. I asked our >> distributor for a list of what he carries. We can only deal with 1 >> company for PO purposes. >> >> One issue I had with the Rose KVM is that it would frequently go >> offline. Specifically, I could access it from the local screen, but no= t >> remote, so I would have to power cycle it, and on a few occasions it >> would not even be accessible locally. I would have recommended the Ate= n >> KH1516i unit but JABR had not installed it at that time, and out IT >> people recommended Rose. >> --=20 Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org> Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |