![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 8/15/2010 6:30 PM, Richard Pieri wrote: > Sun did release the Java EE (enterprise edition) under the GPL. Look up "Project Glassfish". And, in fact, that code is still currently available on Oracle's web site: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javaee/community/index.html > > None of which is immediately relevant to the Oracle v. Google suit. This is a patent suit because Google didn't license Java Mobile Edition (Java ME) -- which was *not* released under an open source license -- from Sun. The new piece of info I gleaned today was that Sun granted royalty-free licenses to all its java-related patents for versions of Java that complied /completely/ with the java standard. Google's Dalvik, and Java ME on which it is based, is not a complete implementation of the full java standard, so those royalty-free licenses technically don't apply (regardless of whether the code for Java ME was open-source or not). Taken on the face of it, Oracle has a pretty strong case. That assumes the patents hold up though. It remains to be seen whether the patents are strong enough to survive a challenge. Matt
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |