Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On > Behalf Of Jarod Wilson > > ^ Note that there is no specific mention of NAT here. ^ > etc. Apparently we're just arguing about semantics here. Because we both agreed on the actual points. The actual points were: With just a router, you cannot take inbound requests on some IP address port 80, and then direct the traffic to different internal servers based on which page was requested. There must be a web server or something that understands http, which is the NAT target, which could then either proxy or redirect the traffic to multiple internal servers.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |