Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Edward Ned Harvey <blu-Z8efaSeK1ezqlBn2x/YWAg at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> From: discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org [mailto:discuss-bounces-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org] On Behalf >> Of Bill Bogstad >> >> > The problem is google. ?They're simply unreliable. ?Go try it from a >> >... >> >> You can check on Google's understanding of their status at the web page: >> >> http://www.google.com/appsstatus >> >> For what it is worth they show no problems for any of their services >> for the last six days. > > It doesn't matter. ?I support google apps at work, and google is constantly > having "little" problems that they don't know about. ?And if you try calling > support, they're useless. That doesn't make that web page useless. You just have to treat it as having false negatives. If they say there are having a problem then it probably isn't worth your time to investigate if it is a problem with your setup until they say they aren't having a problem. If they say everything is fine then you have no evidence either way. Even with the best pro-active automated monitoring system the most an "OK" signal can tell you is that the kinds of problems for which tests have been written aren't occurring. > It doesn't register on their radar, if it only affects one person, or only > one thing they do, or something like that. Did you look at the URL I sent? It lists the status of 13 Google services independently. From previous experience, I can tell you that they do list problems with services on something more then an "all or nothing" basis. Bill Bogstad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |