Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 19:32 +0000, jc-8FIgwK2HfyJMuWfdjsoA/w at public.gmane.org wrote: > (Actually, that's an easy question to answer: When people are dying > of cancer, heart disease, malaria and AIDS by the millions, why would > we spend our limited human and financial resources studying something > so inconsequential as a keyboard layout? So only people with an > interest in the Dvorak layout have a motive to study the topic. ;-) Well, it may be inconsequential to researchers responsible for providing solutions to those (admittedly serious) problems, but that's not the day-to-day stuff of business, where managers must concern themselves with increasing their firms' profitability to the point where those companies can afford to contribute to research for cures of disease. The tools available to businessmen, unlike those in research laboratories, are the prosaic ones of Operations Research, so let's do a little back-of-the-envelope analysis: An "average" typing speed is 30 Words per minute, or 7200 words per day in an eight-hour-shift, assuming a 50% mix of typing and other tasks. For an environment where the "loaded" cost of each employee is $100.00, an eight hour shift costs $800. That equates to a cost-per-word of $0.056. If the Dvorak layout increased typing speed by 10%, then the cost per word goes down to $0.05. This is, of course, a simplistic comparison, but my point is that when a company is paying $100/hour, small changes add up. The question, then, is whether Dvorak is more efficient to a degree that would justify altering our childrens' keyboards so that they grow up with it, and having computers instead of mechanical typewriters gives us the chance to find out. It doesn't take that many people, and there may already be a sufficienctly large sample of Dvorak users available to settle the question: if not, we can train some children on Dvorak without affecting their job prospects or employability in any significant way. FWIW. YMMV. Bill
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |