![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 05/10/2011 11:17 AM, Jarod Wilson wrote: > Another pro to consider: menus aren't duplicated needlessly > across multiple instances of the same program. Part of this has > to do with how processes are launch in, say, gnome, vs. in Mac > OS X. Two gnome terminal windows == two different applications, > each with its own menu[*]. Two Terminal terminal windows on OS X > is two windows of the same application. One menu bar instead of > two. Now add a bunch more terminal windows and consider which > one makes better use of screen real estate. That would be more compelling if the major terminal programs (gnome-terminal, konsole) hadn't taken a tip from Powershell and started supporting tabbed instances. I only ever start one instance of gnome-terminal, then ctrl-shift-t until have my workspace. Or just turn off the menu bar (since I never use it on terminals anyway). > Regardless of desktop OS and menu location, keyboard shortcuts and > contextual menus ftw. At least in my case, I rarely ever have to > go to the menu bar on any OS. Whole-heartedly agree for terminal-like applications. Some apps (gimp?) lend themselves to much heavier menu use. Maybe I'm just not very proficient in gimp, but I imagine it (or any other full-featured image-manipulation program) would be a PITA to use with MacOS-style menus... Matt
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |